Take action and help wolves

In British Columbia, Canada, wolves continue to be killed through a variety of means. These include legal recreational hunting and trapping. You can help us to end the killing of BC’s wolves.

Photo by Michelle Valberg.

Over 1,200 BC wolves killed annually for “recreational” purposes

In British Columbia the provincial government estimates that some 1,200 wolves are killed on an annual basis for recreational purposes. Recreational, in this context, means to kill a wolf for the purposes of sport, trophy, and perceived competition for shared prey. Raincoast large carnivore experts suspect that number is likely even higher given BC’s weak reporting requirements and inadequate conservation enforcement capability. 

Recreational hunting  is the largest source of mortality for wolves. There is no species licence (or tags) required for BC residents to hunt wolves, and in many regions in BC there is no limit to the number of wolves that can be killed daily. In many regions in BC there is no limit to the number of wolves that can be killed daily. Hunting season is often open from September to June, and can include the period from April-May when wolves den and pups are born.

Wolf in the grass.
Photo by Colleen Gara

Take action now

Contact the Honourable George Heyman, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, to let them know it is time to stop the hunting and trapping of BC’s wolves. We’ve provided this short email below for you to contact the relevant ministries. Adding your own sentiment is helpful and makes it more likely that the ministers listen.

Coastal wolf howling in the woods.
Photo by Tom McPherson, Seaforth Expeditions

You will get an email asking you to confirm your action email to the Honourable Minister George Heyman.

Act now to save wolves

Dear Honourable Minister,

%your signature%

You can add formatting using markdown syntax - read more

Share this with your friends:

   

The killing of wolves is not ethical

The question is not whether killing wolves is ‘sustainable’, as wildlife managers are always trying to assert. The question is whether it is ecologically, ethically, or even economically defensible to kill large numbers of predators anywhere. The answer on all counts is no: there are no reasonable ecological reasons to kill wolves, there are no valid economic reasons, and clearly there are no tenable ethical reasons.

This is not science based management

The fundamentals of science-based management are not in place including clear objectives, use of evidence, transparency, and external review. The BC government does not have adequate population estimates for wolves and does not reveal how hunting quotas for wolves are determined.

Accountability and progress

Current wolf management policy in British Columbia, that permits activity that is so misaligned with commonly held societal values, requires immediate attention by our elected representatives, who are accountable to the public.

Wolves in the Great Bear Rainforest

Our campaign to stop commercial trophy hunting in the Great Bear Rainforest includes wolves. We began purchasing hunting tenures back in 2005, when it was clear a different solution to the vagaries of political objectives was needed. We now control the commercial hunting rights in five tenures, more than 38,000 km2 of the BC coast – an area larger than Vancouver Island or the entire country of Belgium. 

We are currently raising funds to purchase the Southern Great Bear Rainforest Tenure, which covers 18,239 km2, more than a quarter of the Great Bear Rainforest. Purchasing this tenure protects wolves and dozens of other species from being commercially trophy hunted because it gives us the exclusive rights to commercially guide trophy hunters.

Government sanctioned culls

In BC and Alberta, wolf management is a pseudonym for aerial gunning, shooting, poisoning, and trapping wolves in strangling neck snares at the hands of provincial governments. Many scientists and conservationists have condemned BC’s wolf kill program as an “inhumane” slaughter of wolves that has ambiguous scientific support as a conservation measure for endangered caribou. In other words, wolves are scapegoated for the decline of caribou in a morally and scientifically dubious attempt to protect Canada’s industrial sacred cows: oil and gas, mining, and forestry. We remain opposed to wolf culls here in BC and elsewhere.

A wolf prances across the ice with all four feet frozen in time floating above the ice, a chart floating in the distance.

Recommendations towards greater transparency in the science, science communication, and values-driven processes of natural resource management

Posted on
|
A new paper, published by a team of researchers including Raincoast scientists, dives into the tangle of cognitive bias, institutional agendas, human interests, and pays special attention to the role of undisclosed value judgments.